Skip to main content

Editorial only. Trading CFDs is high-risk — most retail accounts lose money. We are not a broker and not a financial adviser. Capital at risk. Verify regulation and terms directly with each broker before opening an account.

Editorial only. Trading CFDs is high-risk — most retail accounts lose money. We are not a broker and not a financial adviser. Capital at risk. Verify regulation and terms directly with each broker before opening an account. AiFortexBroker is an independent comparison site operated by NorwegianSpark SA (Org. 834 984 172). For regulatory complaints contact the relevant national authority in your country.

Skip to content
NorwegianSparkAiFortexBroker
Broker Reviews
Best OverallBest for BeginnersBest for ForexBest for CFDsBest for CryptoCompare All Brokers
Platforms
MetaTrader 4MetaTrader 5cTraderThinkorSwimOther Platforms
Find My BrokerJournalTutorialsLearn
Pepperstone vs IC Markets 2026: Which ECN Broker Wins?
Comparisons

Pepperstone vs IC Markets 2026: Which ECN Broker Wins?

NorwegianSpark EditorialSep 202411 min

Written with AI assistance and reviewed by the NorwegianSpark SA editorial team.

Head-to-Head Overview

FeaturePepperstoneIC Markets
Trust Score96/10093/100
RegulatorsFCA, ASIC, CySEC, DFSA, SCBASIC, CySEC, FSA
EUR/USD SpreadFrom 0.0 pipsFrom 0.0 pips
Commission$3.50/lot$3.50/lot
Min DepositNone$200
PlatformsMT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingViewMT4, MT5, cTrader
Instruments1,200+2,250+
ExecutionLow-latency ECNLow-latency ECN

Regulation — Pepperstone Wins

This is the clearest difference. Pepperstone holds 5 regulatory licences including the FCA (UK). This means UK traders get £85,000 FSCS protection.

IC Markets has 3 licences. ASIC regulation is strong, but CySEC (Cyprus) and FSA (Seychelles) offer significantly less protection than FCA.

If you're trading meaningful capital, FCA regulation matters.

Execution — Both Fast, Pepperstone Marginally Ahead

Both brokers run ECN execution on co-located infrastructure built for low-latency order flow, and neither is prone to meaningful slippage on orders under 10 lots. Pepperstone's multi-server setup and TradingView routing give it a marginal edge for latency-sensitive strategies, though in practice both are excellent for retail order sizes.

Platform Variety — Pepperstone Wins

Pepperstone's TradingView integration is a genuine advantage. Being able to execute trades directly from TradingView charts — with Pepperstone's ECN conditions — is something IC Markets doesn't yet offer retail clients.

Instrument Range — IC Markets Wins

With 2,250+ instruments vs Pepperstone's 1,200, IC Markets offers significantly more variety — particularly for commodity and crypto CFD traders.

Our Verdict

Choose Pepperstone if: You're in the UK (FCA/FSCS), want TradingView, or prioritise regulatory depth.

Choose IC Markets if: You want maximum instrument range, are a high-volume EA trader, or $200 minimum deposit isn't a barrier.

Both are genuine tier-1 ECN brokers. You won't go wrong with either. Both also run no-dealing-desk execution, which matters more than most beginners realise — see our explainer on ECN vs market maker brokers for why the execution model changes your spreads and removes the broker's conflict of interest.

Past performance is not indicative of future results. CFDs are complex instruments. Always verify current spreads directly with the broker.

Top Pick

PE

Pepperstone

Score: 96/100

Pepperstone is a top-tier ECN broker regulated by FCA and ASIC. Known for institutional-grade spreads and lightning-fast...

Visit Pepperstone

72.9–79.6% of retail accounts lose money (varies by Pepperstone entity)

Editorial only. Trading CFDs is high-risk — most retail accounts lose money. We are not a broker and not a financial adviser. Capital at risk. Verify regulation and terms directly with each broker before opening an account.

Related Articles

Comparisons

ECN vs Market Maker Brokers: Which Execution Model Is Better?

ECN, STP and market-maker brokers fill your orders in very different ways — and it changes your spreads, your slippage and whether the broker profits when you lose. Here is the honest comparison.

NorwegianSpark

Expert broker reviews and regulatory guides for informed trading decisions.

Verified by AiFortexBrokerCapital at Risk

Quick Links

  • Broker Reviews
  • Compare Brokers
  • Find My Broker
  • Journal
  • Tutorials
  • Learn
  • Regulations

Legal

  • About
  • Privacy
  • Disclosure
  • Terms
  • Contact

More from NorwegianSpark

  • AiCryptoCoin— Crypto
  • YieldNav— Investing
  • BankTopp— Banking

Capital at risk. This is not financial advice.
Tax on profits may apply. Editorial only — we are not a broker and not a financial adviser.

Affiliate disclosure: We may earn a commission when you open an account through links on this site. This does not affect our rankings. Full disclosure

© 2026 NorwegianSpark SA. All rights reserved.

AiFortexBroker is owned and operated by NorwegianSpark SA | Org: 834 984 172 | Bank: Wise | norwegianspark@gmail.com | thomaslien@norwegianspark.com | +47 99 73 74 67
Tveitagarden 4, 5357 Fjell, Norway